<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Pundit: Liverpool 2, Manchester United 0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://unprofessionalfoul.com/2009/10/26/the-pundit-liverpool-2-manchester-united-0/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://unprofessionalfoul.com/2009/10/26/the-pundit-liverpool-2-manchester-united-0/</link>
	<description>`</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 15:16:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wedel</title>
		<link>http://unprofessionalfoul.com/2009/10/26/the-pundit-liverpool-2-manchester-united-0/comment-page-1/#comment-54251</link>
		<dc:creator>Wedel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 02:56:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unprofessionalfoul.com/?p=9192#comment-54251</guid>
		<description>NYK: Agree (quietly). As Rob Smyth says, I was filing it under &quot;seen it given.&quot;

Georger: I was staying away from that one since it was Owen (see JT&#039;s comment), but I saw similarities between Carra&#039;s takedown and Vidic&#039;s last year.  Don&#039;t know if United would have gotten some balls being up a man.

JT: Good point on the lack of complaining; I was too busy being beside myself to notice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NYK: Agree (quietly). As Rob Smyth says, I was filing it under &#8220;seen it given.&#8221;</p>
<p>Georger: I was staying away from that one since it was Owen (see JT&#8217;s comment), but I saw similarities between Carra&#8217;s takedown and Vidic&#8217;s last year.  Don&#8217;t know if United would have gotten some balls being up a man.</p>
<p>JT: Good point on the lack of complaining; I was too busy being beside myself to notice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James T</title>
		<link>http://unprofessionalfoul.com/2009/10/26/the-pundit-liverpool-2-manchester-united-0/comment-page-1/#comment-54240</link>
		<dc:creator>James T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 01:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unprofessionalfoul.com/?p=9192#comment-54240</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll say this regarding the Carra-on-Carrick, Wedel: barely any United players stirred up much complaint, including Carrick.

Carra could have been sent off, sure, but considering that he gave Vidic a yellow (his 2nd yellow) for something similar kinda makes the point that it was only a booking. Sure, in Carra&#039;s case he was closer to goal, but there were several defenders in range and given that it was Michael freakin&#039; Owen on the ball, we can&#039;t really call it a clear goal-scoring opportunity, can we? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll say this regarding the Carra-on-Carrick, Wedel: barely any United players stirred up much complaint, including Carrick.</p>
<p>Carra could have been sent off, sure, but considering that he gave Vidic a yellow (his 2nd yellow) for something similar kinda makes the point that it was only a booking. Sure, in Carra&#8217;s case he was closer to goal, but there were several defenders in range and given that it was Michael freakin&#8217; Owen on the ball, we can&#8217;t really call it a clear goal-scoring opportunity, can we? :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Georger</title>
		<link>http://unprofessionalfoul.com/2009/10/26/the-pundit-liverpool-2-manchester-united-0/comment-page-1/#comment-54237</link>
		<dc:creator>Georger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 00:54:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unprofessionalfoul.com/?p=9192#comment-54237</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think that penalty or Kuyt&#039;s is given in that game.  Though I do think Carra&#039;s foul at the end could easily have been a red, though I doubt it would have mattered much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think that penalty or Kuyt&#8217;s is given in that game.  Though I do think Carra&#8217;s foul at the end could easily have been a red, though I doubt it would have mattered much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The NY Kid</title>
		<link>http://unprofessionalfoul.com/2009/10/26/the-pundit-liverpool-2-manchester-united-0/comment-page-1/#comment-54230</link>
		<dc:creator>The NY Kid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 00:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unprofessionalfoul.com/?p=9192#comment-54230</guid>
		<description>Wedel - much as I dislike ManU, I would have given the PK in that instance. I thought that Carra got &lt;i&gt;far too much&lt;/i&gt; of Carrick</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wedel &#8211; much as I dislike ManU, I would have given the PK in that instance. I thought that Carra got <i>far too much</i> of Carrick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wedel</title>
		<link>http://unprofessionalfoul.com/2009/10/26/the-pundit-liverpool-2-manchester-united-0/comment-page-1/#comment-54218</link>
		<dc:creator>Wedel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 22:16:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unprofessionalfoul.com/?p=9192#comment-54218</guid>
		<description>JT: Fair do&#039;s to your lot.  I was concerned about exactly this result.  

I don&#039;t see enough of Lucas to really know, but you inadvertently touched on something that surely helped him be more assertive - Fletch&#039;s absence.

Question for anyone still paying attention to this thread: What are your thoughts on Carra&#039;s tackle on Carrick vis a vis Fletcher&#039;s on Fabregas last CL?  My take is Fletch got way more ball, whereas Carra got a whole lot of Carrick.  Carra did get his studs to the ball, but I don&#039;t think he won the ball so much as flattened Carrick (i.e., the ball continued on in what would have been Carrick&#039;s path, so had he not been taken out he goes through on goal).

Anyway, I&#039;d appreciate it if you all would just switch back off and continue your hithertofore impressive sleepwalk to May.  Tell you what, I&#039;ll spot you another double this year in return for number 19.  Do we have a deal?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JT: Fair do&#8217;s to your lot.  I was concerned about exactly this result.  </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t see enough of Lucas to really know, but you inadvertently touched on something that surely helped him be more assertive &#8211; Fletch&#8217;s absence.</p>
<p>Question for anyone still paying attention to this thread: What are your thoughts on Carra&#8217;s tackle on Carrick vis a vis Fletcher&#8217;s on Fabregas last CL?  My take is Fletch got way more ball, whereas Carra got a whole lot of Carrick.  Carra did get his studs to the ball, but I don&#8217;t think he won the ball so much as flattened Carrick (i.e., the ball continued on in what would have been Carrick&#8217;s path, so had he not been taken out he goes through on goal).</p>
<p>Anyway, I&#8217;d appreciate it if you all would just switch back off and continue your hithertofore impressive sleepwalk to May.  Tell you what, I&#8217;ll spot you another double this year in return for number 19.  Do we have a deal?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James T</title>
		<link>http://unprofessionalfoul.com/2009/10/26/the-pundit-liverpool-2-manchester-united-0/comment-page-1/#comment-54205</link>
		<dc:creator>James T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 20:06:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unprofessionalfoul.com/?p=9192#comment-54205</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s how you can tell he suckles at Wenger&#039;s teat, he of the Style Over Substance crowd, although flimsy applies to that subset.

He likes teams who are strong, artful and indirect? Um, Barca?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s how you can tell he suckles at Wenger&#8217;s teat, he of the Style Over Substance crowd, although flimsy applies to that subset.</p>
<p>He likes teams who are strong, artful and indirect? Um, Barca?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Norfolk Ned</title>
		<link>http://unprofessionalfoul.com/2009/10/26/the-pundit-liverpool-2-manchester-united-0/comment-page-1/#comment-54204</link>
		<dc:creator>Norfolk Ned</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 20:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unprofessionalfoul.com/?p=9192#comment-54204</guid>
		<description>&quot;If Liverpool and Manchester United are among the best, the Premier League does not live up to its name.  Both teams were flimsy in midfield, artless and direct.&quot;

Hahahahahahahahaah, hahahahahahahahah, hahahahahah /wiping tears. hahahahahaha. hahahahaha. Oh man, must be squeaky bum time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If Liverpool and Manchester United are among the best, the Premier League does not live up to its name.  Both teams were flimsy in midfield, artless and direct.&#8221;</p>
<p>Hahahahahahahahaah, hahahahahahahahah, hahahahahah /wiping tears. hahahahahaha. hahahahaha. Oh man, must be squeaky bum time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James T</title>
		<link>http://unprofessionalfoul.com/2009/10/26/the-pundit-liverpool-2-manchester-united-0/comment-page-1/#comment-54202</link>
		<dc:creator>James T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 19:55:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unprofessionalfoul.com/?p=9192#comment-54202</guid>
		<description>Duffy&#039;s an idiot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Duffy&#8217;s an idiot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Georger</title>
		<link>http://unprofessionalfoul.com/2009/10/26/the-pundit-liverpool-2-manchester-united-0/comment-page-1/#comment-54201</link>
		<dc:creator>Georger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 19:54:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unprofessionalfoul.com/?p=9192#comment-54201</guid>
		<description>Everything I need to know about Norwich I learn from Stephen Fry&#039;s twitter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everything I need to know about Norwich I learn from Stephen Fry&#8217;s twitter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Norfolk Ned</title>
		<link>http://unprofessionalfoul.com/2009/10/26/the-pundit-liverpool-2-manchester-united-0/comment-page-1/#comment-54200</link>
		<dc:creator>Norfolk Ned</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 19:53:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unprofessionalfoul.com/?p=9192#comment-54200</guid>
		<description>JT, You should have watched last Monday. Could have reported on our awesomeness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JT, You should have watched last Monday. Could have reported on our awesomeness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

