unprofessional foul
Thursday September 2nd 2010

Murder on ‘Main’ Street

Video below of Thierry Henry’s blatant handball setting up the William Gallas goal that sent France to the 2010 World Cup. Watch it while you can. Surely there will be plenty of pontificating about this in the days to come.

48 Comments for “Murder on ‘Main’ Street”

  • phil says:

    Thanks for posting this. Now can you give me papercuts between my fingers and dip my hand in vinegar? Because that might be less painful, you see.

  • phil says:

    BTW, the Chicago Bears have contacted Thierry Henry’s agent, because Henry is faster than any of their receivers, and definitely has better hands.

  • Sarah says:

    I’d rather see Titi playing for the Bears than Domenech’s hot mess of a team.

  • strong like bull smart like tractor says:

    Titi’s buddy Steve Nash would be proud of that bounce pass.

  • Anonsters says:

    Both times were deliberate, but it’s the 2nd one that kills me.

  • Anonsters says:

    And oh yeah, he was offsides, too. Unbelievable.

  • Precious Roy says:

    Maybe I’m blind but I only see one touch. Granted it’s about the most blatant handball ever… Bummer, this will forever be linked to one of the 2 or 3 best players ever to grace the grounds at Highbury.

  • The NY Kid says:

    @PR – I only see 1 touch as well, but whatever.

    Also, the only player offsides was Squillaci – both Titi and Gallas were on.

  • Precious Roy says:

    Lost in all of this… Henry actually makes a nice stab with his right foot to find Gallas.

  • Anonsters says:

    There are definitely two touches. The ball bounces up on his arm, and you can clearly see him move his arm/hand and hit the ball again.

  • The NY Kid says:

    OK – just saw the slo-mo from Sky Sports News that showed the 2 touches.

  • The Fan's Attic says:

    @NYK: does that make a difference? he’s still a cheat. a dirty fucking cheat.

  • ebullientfatalist says:

    This would be a non-issue if Robbie Keane could finish.

    But yeah, On-ree cheated. Poorly.

  • Harry's the King of Transfers says:

    I am gutted for the Irish. Cheated

  • Dools says:

    The emails and texts from my friends named Doucette and Giguere, respectively, claiming to be “Canadian-French” after seeing the replay don’t make me feel much better. But beer helps.

  • The Likely Lad says:

    love the arsenal frenchies here rationalizing what happened. youre all guilty! arsene, vieira, gallas, henry,.. down the line. They should have their epl titles revoked.

  • Harry's the King of Transfers says:

    Cheating whiny shites. Titi, what the fuck is that about? Such a talent yet he cheated. That will be remembered more than the goals and trophies.

  • James T says:

    Jesus Christ, he flat-out slaps the ball down to himself! Fuck! Still, if it wasn’t Thierry, it would have been Sepp. FIFA would have found a way

  • Sarah says:

    I’m not rationalizing anything. It shouldn’t have been a goal.

    That being said, there’s not a whole lot he could do to make me dislike him. He could kick my puppy and I’d probably be okay with it.

  • phil says:

    The best part of this whole ordeal will be when FIFA gives France a seed.

  • Ryan says:

    I wasn’t a huge fan of the Europa League 5 referee scheme. But if that system was in place today, you have to think he would have been right on top of that.

  • James T says:

    We can, nay, we MUST, take some solace from the fact that this French squad will fail miserably in South Africa.

  • jjf3 says:

    @Ryan: agreed, but how the fuck were the 3 refs already on the field not aware of it? Regardless of which side of the field the linesman is on, there is only one rational thing that can keep that ball in the field of play, and its Titi’s arm. Even if he’s somehow blocked by either Henry’s back or the goalposts (don’t know which side he was on), the ball was going out of the field of play and clearly neither his feet or chest are involved. And this even disregards WTF the lead ref might/should have seen…

  • Ryan says:

    Yeah, I was thinking about that while I was walking around earlier. Maybe the referee saw all the Irish hands raised and thought they were claiming the ball had gone out, and was looking for that instead of for a handball? That’s about all I can really think of.

  • phil says:

    @ Ryan: I would think that Given screaming “That’s a handball! He hit with his hand!” then grabbing the ref’s hand for emphasis would have dispelled any doubt he might have had about what their complaint was.

  • Ryan says:

    @Oh yeah, yeah, yeah. I should have made it more clear, I am talking about at the exact instant it touched his hand. I think sometimes ARs can be talked into those calls based on the hand motions of players.

  • phil says:

    No doubt. And let’s not forget that after 110+ minutes of hearing Keane screeching like a banshee as he ran about had probably rendered that official a bit mute to anything sounded remotely Irish.

  • Dustin says:

    Both Refs could have been screened, it’s not like these sort of plays happen in slow motion or a vacuum. I never thought it was fair proving the ref missed something from a camera where a referee clearly can’t be.

  • phil says:

    I would say that it’s part of the match official’s job to keep on the move so that he’s always in proper position to make the call.

  • John says:

    phil: the ref would have needed to be either out of bounds or right in the middle of the group of players to see that. Now maybe the linesman should have had a better angle but I’m guessing he was focused on the possible offside.

  • phil says:

    Obviously, the linesman wasn’t focused on the offside, or he’d have called the offside. Squillaci was offside when the kick was taken.

  • James T says:

    Phil: here’s where I deviate slightly from my complete agreement with you up to this point. The referees do their best to maintain proper positioning, but honestly, the right spot for him in this situation is outside the box and central to play. His linesman are there to note skirmishes and/or incidents in the box from their vantage points that he does not have access to himself; in that stage of the game, he is placing himself as correctly as can be.

    And furthermore, asking him to be in the proper position to make calls is like asking him to predict the future and adjust his movements accordingly. There are so many flashing incidents within the course of a 90-minute game, and no way of knowing where on the pitch these things will occur. All he can hope to do is to be within 10-15 yards of the play, in a position that neither interferes with the passage of play nor hinders his ability to call the game. Those two nonces on the sidelines are supposed to make the most of their fairly static positioning to see things that he cannot. If he misses something, they flag accordingly and bring an infringement to his attention. If they both miss something, there’s no recourse for a replay.

    I’m thinking the linesmen were watching for the likelihood of the ball crossing the line to make sure that they spotted it.

  • Johnny Clamboat says:

    @Dustin… The linesman was not screened. There was no one between him and Titi

  • hockalees says:

    I was going to post about how this incident might finally be the straw that breaks the resolve to FIFA to ignore the use of instant replay and a 5th official. How hard would it be for a 5th official to signal the ref before the re-kick to disallow the goal and penalize Henry in this case? Not very. Like the NFL, FIFA could lay out the scenarios in which the 5th official could help the ref catch simulation and cheating.

    The NHL manages to have folks in Toronto review EVERY GOAL, scored in every game, every night AS IT HAPPENS. There should be a way for a 4th official in the press box to handle this in soccer. By the way, I was watching the Stars game tonight and the refs blew a call when they disallowed a Brad May goal for the Dead Wings… even when the replays showed that the goal scored before the whistle blew. So no plan is foolproof but at least it would be an improvement.

  • ebullientfatalist says:

    I’m just disappointed in Henry. That’s it.

  • Georger says:

    Not only that, hockey started using the goal judge system (you know, a guy that sits behind the fucking net and decides whether the puck crossed the line in real time) OVER A HUNDRED AND THIRTY YEARS AGO. But yeah, such a system clearly isn’t feasible in soccer and would hurt the sport’s tradition.

  • hockalees says:

    Make that 5th official in the second paragraph.

    Oh, I agree with Sarah, no rationalizing the undeserved goal, but Thierry is still a legend… can’t wait to get my pic with him when NYRB play at Pizza Hut Park in a year or so. And only Spuds fans will chose to remember this as Henry’s legacy (oh and Georger… he hates everything ;-P )

  • Georger says:

    FUCK YOU!

  • Georger says:

    ;)

  • Anonsters says:

    Reading the Irish papers, and seeing other Henry quotes about, it appears that he admitted to the Irish players that he did handle the ball (although he claims he didn’t mean to; let the replay be the judge of his intent, it’s clear). Nevertheless, one suggestion, I think from Trap, that merits attention: why didn’t the referee just ask Henry whether he handled the ball?

    Would Henry have told the ref. the truth, given the situation there?

  • James T says:

    He should have… I mean, if he honestly did tell the Irish players at the time, why wouldn’t he tell the ref?

    I hate to do this, but let’s not forget the number of gilt-edged chances fluffed by Keane and Duff in the 2nd half. They could have buried the tie long before extra time. That said, doesn’t excuse Henry of his rather blatant handball. It had to be intentional, didn’t it? He slaps the ball out of the air so it lands at his feet!

  • Norfolk Ned says:

    NOOOOOO Cheating is cheating. Deliberate. Its outrageous. Told the ref? Looks like he celebrated when i saw the replay.

  • Defoe's a Yiddo says:

    I agree with ned here. Dont let Henry get off with the “I told the ref” He celebrated the goal like he did nothing wrong. He should have been embarrassed. Ginola speaks some sense

    Former France international David Ginola on BBC Radio 5 Live: “I’m very embarrassed by the situation. I don’t feel very proud to be French this morning. The Irish played very well and they deserved to go through as much as France, maybe more. I’m very surprised Fifa haven’t mentioned anything about it – the whole world saw the handball. This is a pure injustice. Everyone in France, the press and everyone, says there should be a replay.”

  • Clemantona says:

    Ok, here’s what i’m conceding:
    1. it’s obvious he cheated
    2. it’s obvious FIFA and the lot made this seeding nonsense with the sole aim being to favor teams like france and portugal
    3. it’s obvious that Ireland didn’t deserve this end and played incredibly well and France were lucky in both goals over both legs
    4. it’s obvious this was one of the most catastrophic no-calls i’ve ever witnessed

    but what i’m getting tired of is hearing that Ireland “deserved” to go through.

    Game 2 stats per ESPN:
    16 shots 8 on target vs 5 shorts and 2 on target
    7 corners vs 4
    even amount of possession (53 vs 47)

    Game 1 stats also favor France

    Ireland deserved to not have it end like this but neither team “deserved” to go through based on their play alone

  • ü75 says:

    I can’t remember if it was pointed out above, but Trap seems to be the only one associated with the Irish team that acknowledges that if that goal was disallowed, the most likely outcome for the Irish was a cointoss–PKs. There’s way too much whinging out there that assumes the team was already through without the goal. The game was in ET for a reason.

  • ü75 says:

    Besides, without watching the match, I’m sure there were at least a dozen times the Irish team got away with a non-call yesterday. It happens in every match, and the key is not to get beat by it. That’s where they failed.

    (Not that there was much any of them could have done in the half-second between the hand ball and the goal. Best case is that Given maybe could have not focused on Henry’s hand and instead where the ball was going, but even that is a reach.)

  • Anonsters says:

    Yeah, I don’t buy the Ireland deserved to go through bit, either.

    But they did deserve a chance to play the 2nd period of ET at 1-0 and possibly have a shot at penalties.

  • Peter says:

    A blatant handball, yes, but where was the defending on Gallas who is standing unmarked almost in the goal…another case of my least-favorite thing in football, when defenders stop and put their hands up when they think its offsides instead of playing to the whistle…the hand up doesn’t do shit for the ref, play to the end and this may not have happened


Leave a Comment

More from category

Mourinho: I’m Not Harry Potter
Mourinho: I’m Not Harry Potter

New Real Madrid manager Jose Mourinho endeavored to splash some cold water on Real Madrid fans by telling them he is [Read More]

Rubin Kazan Have An Awesome Goalkeeper
Rubin Kazan Have An Awesome Goalkeeper

The Russian Premier League powerhouses made some quality signings this summer—attacking midfielder Carlos Eduardo [Read More]

Proof That FIFA Don’t Even Watch Their Own Tournaments
Proof That FIFA Don’t Even Watch Their Own Tournaments

If I asked you to identify three England players who excelled in South Africa, could you name even one? Of course you [Read More]

Genetic Testing for the Next WC Superstar
Genetic Testing for the Next WC Superstar

Ever since the beginning of time (or at least since the dawning of huge athlete paydays), parents have been looking to [Read More]

Mikel Are-Not-A Three Lion
Mikel Are-Not-A Three Lion

After Mikel Arteta made noise last month about playing for the Three Lions, it appears the FA has snuffed out the idea [Read More]

Recent Comments

Stoke City Eastern Bloc had this to say

"The game finished 1-1." A well-buried lede, indeed. Read the post

corky had this to say

@ Fan's Attic. But, yet, no touching in Oregon. Here in Texas, the dancers nearly rape you in your seat. And we stay Read the post

The Fan's Attic had this to say

OM: You too have revealed too much. Read the post

Outside Mid had this to say

@ TFA: I can see that. So The Special One is Prongs/yes, I know my Harry Potter far too well. Read the post

The NY Kid had this to say

@OM - alright, I literally LOL'ed at that Read the post