Comments on: NASL being sued by USL http://unprofessionalfoul.com/2009/12/10/nasl-being-sued-by-usl/ ` Fri, 25 May 2012 15:16:51 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: FORMER USL FAN http://unprofessionalfoul.com/2009/12/10/nasl-being-sued-by-usl/comment-page-1/#comment-72638 FORMER USL FAN Thu, 10 Dec 2009 23:13:56 +0000 http://unprofessionalfoul.com/?p=11219#comment-72638 USL employees continue to post false information and articles on the internet which claim USL stil has a following. How dumb do they think soccer fans are. The only fans still interested in USL are fans of three teams who are comenting all over the internet that they want their clubs to join the NASL. Sorry USL, but writing yourself fan mail is not going to change the fact that the USL is DONE! USL employees continue to post false information and articles on the internet which claim USL stil has a following. How dumb do they think soccer fans are. The only fans still interested in USL are fans of three teams who are comenting all over the internet that they want their clubs to join the NASL.

Sorry USL, but writing yourself fan mail is not going to change the fact that the USL is DONE!

]]> By: Anonsters http://unprofessionalfoul.com/2009/12/10/nasl-being-sued-by-usl/comment-page-1/#comment-72502 Anonsters Thu, 10 Dec 2009 16:53:50 +0000 http://unprofessionalfoul.com/?p=11219#comment-72502 From the press release: "USL further believes TOA is <i>tortuously interfering</i> with USL-1 team owners that are contractually obligated to participate in the 2010 season.... USL will vigorously defend its legal interests against the TOA’s <i>tortuous interference</i> in contractual relationships with its team owners." (Emphasis added.) Goodbye tortious interference, hello tortuous interference. I wonder if they have any colorable claims for torturous interference. From the press release:

“USL further believes TOA is tortuously interfering with USL-1 team owners that are contractually obligated to participate in the 2010 season…. USL will vigorously defend its legal interests against the TOA’s tortuous interference in contractual relationships with its team owners.” (Emphasis added.)

Goodbye tortious interference, hello tortuous interference.

I wonder if they have any colorable claims for torturous interference.

]]>