Unprofessional Foul
`



All

March 23, 2011

The Six Match Theory

Wondered How This Guy Hung Around So Long

It was mentioned on a recent Sound of Football podcast, so I thought it might be worth examining to check it’s worthiness. And yes–listening to another site’s podcast made me feel unclean and traitorous.

This month’s water bill will be massive after the time I spent in the shower rinsing off the guilt.

The idea raised was that the lifespan of a Premiership manager’s current position is roughly a half dozen matches. When a squad undergoes a rough patch of form, alarm bells sound for club directors and owners and change in the dugout can be expected if rot is not stopped by the 6th consecutive match. This theory was used to explain why gaffers like Arsene Wenger and Alex Ferguson are still with their respective clubs for such a long period when the average Prem manager lasts less than two years.

So let’s look at the gaffers sacked this Premiership season and put the Six Match Theory to the test. This being a third rate site, it will be even less precise than an apple falling on Newton’s head.

Newcastle United didn’t even allow Chris Hughton to get to the 6th match this season–Mike Ashley shockingly sacked the gaffer after the fifth one. Following a solid 5-1 thrashing of Sunderland on Halloween and a 1-0 victory of Arsenal, the Magpies went on a 5 match stretch that included losses to Blackburn, Bolton, and West Brom Albion. Despite having drawn Chelsea in that stretch, 2 points from 5 matches was apparently too little for a newly-promoted side, so enter the Pardew.

Baggies Think Saggy More Sexy

The six matches preceding Roberto Di Matteo’s sacking at West Brom did include a 3-2 win over Blackpool mid-January, but only a draw to Wigan accompanied losses to Fulham, Blackburn, and both clubs from Manchester. Perhaps for Baggies’ Chair Jeremy Peace, a previous 6 match run of stink  in the month of November that had seen Di Matteo keep his job was being addressed retroactively.

That, or the mouth-watering prospect of having Roy Hodgson manage the club was too much to pass up.

Speaking of Woy, prior to being sacked at Anfield, his six matches were inconsistent in the extreme–and certainly justified a rough patch for a club like Liverpool. Losses to Tottenham, Wolverhampton, and Newcastle were accompanied by wins over Villa and Bolton. His final match–a loss away to Blackburn–apparently was the final straw for NESV after seeing 8000 fewer supporters for the Merseyside club show up for the Bolton win.

Draws in Europa League play to the likes of Steaua Bucharest and Utrecht–along with a fear that Hodgson would catch Anfield on fire from the friction he caused by rubbing his face so furiously–might have also played a role in his departure.

Of course, the one gaffer sacked this season whose form doesn’t necessarily comport to the Six Match Theory is Sam Allardyce. In his six matches leading up to his shock dismissal, Big Sam managed 3 wins over clubs one would expect Rovers could win while only taking losses to clubs where the best they could hope for is a draw.

Perhaps shipping 7 against United was too much for the chicken pluckers to stomach, but it seems even the Six Match Theory would not have predicted Big Sam’s dismissal at Ewood Park.

This theory might go to explain why some managers are still with the same clubs despite being in a relegation battle throughout. Avram Grant’s West Ham began the season with 4 losses, but Match #6 was  a win over Tottenham. The Hammers have had mediocre 6 match runs for the remainder with several draws mixed in with a few losses, but otherwise, Grant’s lads have found a way to break up the funk.

That FA Cup run seems to have helped a bit too.

That Way to the Hole

Mick McCarthy’s another manager who was saved on Match 6. During a rough part of Wolverhampton’s schedule that had Wolves play and lose to Villa, Wigan, Chelsea, and Manchester United (in the Carling Cup), Mick found a way to put two in the hole over Citeh on Match #6 in the run to break the skid.

Wolves followed up that Citeh victory with another poor run, but Mick’s lads got him off the hook by Match 5. Other shoddy patches have been punctuated by shock victories over the likes of Liverpool, Chelsea, and Manchester United.

I guess when you hand Sir Alex his first loss of the season, you get to hang around a bit longer.

Now, why is any of this being mentioned? Well, looking at Arsenal’s recent stink of a stretch, the recent draw to WBA was Match 6 in a run that saw a tidy 5-0 win over Leyton Orient in the FA Cup, but cup losses to Birmingham, Barcelona, and Manchester United. A win over Stoke and a goalless draw with Sunderland is what’s been mustered in league play during that period.

So, Wenger’s still around, but can the expiration date be approaching if form doesn’t change with the next couple matches with Blackburn and Blackpool? And what of Harry Redknapp and Tottenham? Following the win over Milan in the Champions League, Spurs fans haven’t seen a win and witnessed a choke-job of a 3-1 loss to Blackpool.

Oh, and Spurs haven’t scored in their last two matches either. Yeah, the Bernabeu might be a nightmare.

Overall, though, it seems that the Six Match Theory does hold a bit of weight. Those managers that are able to break up the monotony of suck tend to hang around longer–even if they don’t always lead their sides to glory. For those managers that have led their clubs to glory, perhaps they get a bit more rope before the noose is tightened.

In the cases of Arsenal and Tottenham, it looks like the theory’s about to be put to the test again.



About the Author

Outside Mid





17 Comments


  1. Mountain Wag

    I learn something new everyday. Truth: There was a time when Roberto Di Matteo had two eyebrows, not just one. Amazing! And…he was kind of cute!


  2. In ‘Arry’s case, I’m sure “2 points from 8 games” to the Champions League garnered him a little extra rope.


  3. I would wager that the new owner effect plays into the length of the leash afforded managers. Hodgson and Allardyce both had new owners to deal with.


  4. TWGreatest

    Does James T still write for UF?


  5. Outside Mid

    @ TFA: New ownership has to help explain Big Sam’s for sure, along with Hodgson. It was just funny to look at McCarthy’s season in light of the 6 Match Theory. Right after a 4th or 5th poor result, something positive seems to have happened for him. Also, who else would want to manage Wolves?


  6. mightymightydr

    L’OM, did you factor in table position? Because Di Matteo, Fat Sam, and Woy were all gaffing underachieving/bottom-half squads.
    -
    Similarly, I think there should be a Mike Ashley Corollary whereby no matter the run of form, or final league position achieved, a NUFC manager is liable to receive a sack.


    • Outside Mid

      @ mighty: No. Again, I just went off the idea from that podcast, looked at the clubs’ run of form up to the sack. Think you and Fan’s Attic are right–an ownership change and Mike Ashley’s general existence adds a fudge factor into the theory.


  7. Enter the Pardew is just a bunch of shitty remixes from Enter the HughTang.


  8. mightymightydr

    I think it’s a good theory, a decent idea, and would like to see it fleshed out more. Not that there is necessarily a formula for when or how a manager is fired, but results on the field have to be paramount to any decision. (Excepting, of course, Mike Ashley.)


  9. Outside Mid

    @ mighty: Yes, I do want to play around with it and go back a bit more. For instance, how many bad 6 game stretches has Ferguson had over his time with United? Has it never happened? And how much does a manager’s experience make a difference? I want to check out Paul Ince’s record with Blackburn before the sack for comparison.


  10. An interesting note about this idea though is that sacking a manager midseason does not provide a large statistical boost to a team beyond the first 3-4 matches. Can’t remember what site I saw the data on, but they had looked at points totals before and after a manager was sacked midseason since 1992, and there was an average of maybe .1 points per game increase under the new manager


  11. mightymightydr

    @Brian: Already defending Moyes’ position I see. (joke) But that is very interesting. Makes one wonder if the best time to bring in a new coach is always at the end of the season.


  12. MP

    @mmdr: Agreed – there are so many more details that need to be taken into account.
    .
    Obviously I’m biased, but I’d argue that Ferguson is the only manager who is completely immune to the six-game theory right now. If United lose six in a row he might retire (or committ suicide, or murder a few referees) but he’s not getting the sack. Wenger too, but six trophy-less seasons are hanging over his head and complete failure over the last 7 games might be the end for him. I think Moyes could probably also survive, but six poor results would send Everton straight into a relegation battle. And Spurs’ success in the CL probably keeps Harry on board even if they tank their last bunch of league games.


    • Outside Mid

      @ MP: As it will forever be burned into my memory, “2 points from 8 games” Juande Ramos might have been given the extra matches b/c he had just come off a Carling Cup winning season with Spurs. So recent cups/titles seem to give managers more time too. Let’s see, we need to include 1. League position 2. Managerial experience 3. New Ownership 4. Cup Success 5. Whether Mike Ashley owns your team to refine this one.


  13. @MP, the only way SAF loses 6 in a row is if they are all against Chelsea with Atkinson reffing


  14. MP

    @Brian: I knew I liked you



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>